![]() ![]() ![]() When I compared NAD, Marantz and Rotel I favoured the Marantz PM7200, but with some serious doubts: the NAD C352 has better dynamics and more drive, but in my set up (cd 5000 sounds agressive at times) the Marantz sounded smoother. The overall sound is bigger, stronger and has a better definition than the C320. It's a very dynamic and warm sounding ( slightly dark colored low midds) amp with a strong bass. I never compared NAD C352 side by side with C320BEE.īut I am confident enough to say that NAD C352 sounds better than C320BEE (those names are really annoying to type ). Later I heard the Rotel RA-02 and NAD C320BEE sise by side. I compared the NAD C352 with the Marantz PM7200 (which I own) and the Rotel RA-02 when I was in a search for a good amp. Well maybe it is, as I said I don't know how it will influence the actual sound. Posted on Thursday, Novem00:10 GMT Maybe i thought if the power amp section of it is good, maybe thew bass definition is smoother and also midrange and treble ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |